APLICAÇÃO DE ANÁLISE ESTATÍSTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO MATEMÁTICA: AVALIAÇÃO DA EFICÁCIA DE MÉTODOS DE ENSINO INOVADORES

Autores/as

  • Erica Gouvea UNITAU
  • Susana Aparecida da Veiga UNITAU
  • Katia Celina da Silva Richetto UNITAU
  • Willian José Ferreira UNITAU
  • Roque Antônio de Moura FATEC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69609/1516-2893.2024.v30.n2.a3886

Palabras clave:

Educação Matemática, Métodos Inovadores, Estatística

Resumen

Este artigo investiga a aplicação de métodos estatísticos para avaliar a eficácia de abordagens inovadoras no ensino de matemática no ensino médio. A pesquisa compara a aprendizagem baseada em problemas (PBL) com métodos tradicionais de ensino, utilizando testes t para amostras independentes e ANOVA para análise de dados. Os resultados indicam que a PBL melhora significativamente o desempenho dos alunos em testes padronizados de matemática, promovendo uma compreensão mais profunda dos conceitos e maior engajamento. Além disso, a PBL desenvolve habilidades de pensamento crítico e colaboração entre os alunos. As implicações deste estudo sugerem que a implementação de métodos de ensino inovadores pode transformar a prática pedagógica na educação matemática, resultando em melhores resultados acadêmicos e maior motivação dos alunos. O artigo conclui com recomendações para futuras pesquisas e práticas educativas.

Citas

Banks, J. A. (2009). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3-12.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.

Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.

Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73.

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). IEEE.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (Eds.). (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning (Vol. 11). IAP.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.pdf

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.

Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.

Liu, O. L., Bridgeman, B., & Adler, R. M. (2012). Measuring learning outcomes in higher education: Motivation matters. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 352-362.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 3.

Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2011). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 71-77

Sousa, D. A. (2008). How the Brain Learns Mathematics. Corwin Press.

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44-58.

Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-11-05

Número

Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2024)

Sección

Artigos

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2024 Susana Aparecida da Veiga, Katia Celina da Silva Richetto, Willian José Ferreira, Erica Gouvea, Roque Antônio de Moura

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

A submissão de originais para este periódico implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original.